Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/94285
Authors: 
Schmitt-Grohe, Stephanie
Uribe, Martin
Year of Publication: 
2000
Series/Report no.: 
Working Papers, Department of Economics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 2000-14
Abstract: 
A key result of a recent literature that focuses on the global consequences of Taylor-type interest rate feedback rules is that such rules in combination with the zero bound on nominal interest rates can lead to unintended liquidity traps. An immediate question posed by this result is whether the government could avoid liquidity traps by ignoring the zero bound, that is, by threatening to set the nominal interest rate at a negative value should the inflation rate fall below a certain threshold. This paper shows that even if the government could credibly commit to setting the interest rate at a negative value, self-fulfilling liquidity traps can still emerge. That is, deflationary equilibria originating arbitrarily near the intended equilibrium and leading to low (possibly zero) interest rates and low (and possibly negative) rates of inflation cannot be ruled out by lifting the zero bound on the monetary policy rule. This result obtains in models with flexible and sticky prices and under continuous and discrete time.
Subjects: 
liquidity traps
Taylor rules
zero bound on nominal interest rates
JEL: 
E31
E52
E63
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
180.78 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.