Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/91664
Authors: 
Popova, Daria
Year of Publication: 
2014
Series/Report no.: 
EUROMOD Working Paper EM2/14
Abstract: 
This paper analyses programmes of cash allowances for children and compares their effectiveness in combating child poverty in Russia and four EU countries Sweden, Germany, Belgium and the United Kingdom. These countries are selected as representatives of alternative family policy models. Using microsimulation models (RUSMOD and EUROMOD), this paper estimates the potential gains if the Russian system were re-designed along the policy parameters of these countries and vice versa. Such an exercise rests on the idea of policy learning and provides policy relevant evidence on how a policy would perform, given different national socio-economic and demographic settings. The results confirm that the poverty impact of the program design is smaller than that of the level of spending. Other conditions being equal, the best outcomes for children are achieved by applying the mix of universal and means-tested child benefits, such as those employed by the UK and Belgium. At the same time, the Russian design of child allowances does not appear to be less effective in terms of its impact on child poverty when transferred to European countries in place of their current arrangements.
Subjects: 
family policy
child benefits
microsimulation
Russia
JEL: 
C81
D31
I38
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
639.59 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.