Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/90626
Authors: 
Merk, Christine
Pönitzsch, Gert
Kniebes, Carola
Rehdanz, Katrin
Schmidt, Ulrich
Year of Publication: 
2014
Series/Report no.: 
Kiel Working Paper 1892
Abstract: 
Solar radiation management (SRM) could quickly offset global warming caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Because SRM would have global side effects, it raises not only technological but also political and social concerns. Therefore, SRM research should be accompanied by a global debate that incorporates public perception and concerns into the development and governance of the technology. Our paper provides insight into public perception and explores its underlying patterns using a survey conducted in Germany. The data reveal a differentiated picture. Laboratory research on SRM is broadly approved, whereas field research is much less approved. Immediate deployment is largely rejected. The acceptance of the technology is associated with the belief that climate change is a severe problem and that humans will eventually be able to control nature. It is also determined by the levels of trust in scientists and firms. Among the strongest objections against the technology is the belief that humans should not manipulate nature in the way SRM would. The actual public perception of SRM will, however, evolve along with the ongoing debate between the public, experts, and policymakers.
Subjects: 
Climate Engineering
Geoengineering
Solar Radiation Management
Climate Change
Public Opinion
Survey
JEL: 
Q54
D19
H43
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.