Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/89538
Authors: 
Fiaschi, Davide
Giuliani, Elisa
Macchi, Chiara
Murano, Michelangelo
Perrone, Oriana
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
LEM Working Paper Series 2011/13
Abstract: 
We are currently observing an apparent paradox. On the one hand there is growing evidence about corporate misbehaviour and Multinational Corporations (MNCs)' violations of human rights. On the other, the largest MNCs are showing an unprecedented level of commitment to save the world through their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives and investments. In this scenario, how much does CSR contribute to curb human rights abuses of the largest worldwide MNCs? This paper investigates this question using a novel dataset of 135 MNCs operating in several sectors over the period 1990-2006. We apply Probit estimations to our data and show that MNCs that have adopted CSR initiatives have higher probabilities of being involved in alleged human rights abuses, but such probability decreases over time, as they accumulate experience in CSR. This result is found for human rights abuses for which MNCs are directly held accountable, whereas our evidence suggests that CSR experience does not curb corporate complicity in abuses committed by third parties. The paper concludes by discussing the normative implications of this result and by suggesting directions for further research.
Subjects: 
Multinational Corporations (MNCs)
Corporate Social Responsibility
Human Rights
Econometrics
JEL: 
F2
M14
K0
C23
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
387.25 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.