Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/89321
Authors: 
Coad, Alex
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
LEM Working Paper Series 2008/13
Abstract: 
This paper is an empirical test of the hypothesis that the appropriateness of different business strategies is conditional on the firm's distance to the industry frontier. We use data on four 2-digit high-tech manufacturing industries in the US over the period 1972-1999, and apply semi-parametric quantile regressions to investigate the contribution of firm behavior to market value at various points of the conditional distribution of Tobin's q. Among our results, we observe that innovative activity, measured in terms of R&D expenditure or patents, has a strong positive association with market value at the upper quantiles (corresponding to the leader firms) whereas the innovative efforts of laggard firms are valued significantly less. Laggard firms, we suggest, should instead achieve productivity growth through efficient exploitation of existing technologies and imitation of industry leaders. Employment growth in leader firms is encouraged whereas growth of backward firms is not as well received on the stock market.
Subjects: 
Distance to frontier
Strategy
Market value
Innovation
Firm Growth
JEL: 
L25
L21
D21
O31
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
507.15 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.