Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/88249 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2012
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Papers on Economics and Evolution No. 1214
Verlag: 
Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena
Zusammenfassung: 
There is a growing consensus in Ecological Economics that consumer preferences are neither fixed nor given, but rather endogenously determined by socio-economic and institutional factors. Hence, policy may promote green preferences directly. Yet any intervention in processes of preference formation seems to conflict with widely held liberal intuitions, imperfectly represented by the principle of Consumer Sovereignty (CS). We argue that a suitably refined, dynamic version of CS may not stand in the way of certain preferenceshaping policies. By exploring different modes of consumer learning that imply varying degrees of behavioral lock-in, we show that there is a scope for policies that influence preference formation without violating CS. This extends the range of normatively acceptable sustainability policies.
Schlagwörter: 
Consumer Behavior
Consumer Welfare
Evolutionary Economics
Sustainability
Consumer Sovereignty
JEL: 
D11
D63
Q58
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
183.71 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.