Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/88060 
Year of Publication: 
2004
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 505
Publisher: 
Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department, Washington, DC
Abstract: 
Conditional transfer programs are becoming a common approach to influence household decisions. The evidence to date is that these programs are good at promoting certain outcomes such as school attendance, but that other outcomes such as reducing child labor are more difficult to achieve. This study examines the impact of Superémonos, a conditional transfer program in Costa Rica, which provides poor families with a subsidy for the purchase of food conditional upon children regularly attending school. Using three different empirical techniques—simple comparison of mean outcomes, regression analysis and propensity score matching—we examine the program’s impact on school attendance, performance in school and child labor. We find strong evidence that the program achieves its goal of improving school attendance and much weaker evidence regarding school performance. The program does not reduce the likelihood that youth will work. These findings are discussed in the context of the results from impact evaluations of other conditional transfer programs.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
261.11 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.