Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/87976
Authors: 
Székely, Miguel
Lustig, Nora
Cumpa, Martin
Mejía-Guerra, José Antonio
Year of Publication: 
2000
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department 437
Abstract: 
This paper tests the sensitivity of poverty indexes to the choice of adult equivalence scales, assumptions about the existence of economies of scale in consumption, methods for treating missing and zero incomes, and different adjustments to handle income misreporting. We also perform sensitivity analysis to the use of different poverty lines and poverty indexes, which are issues that have been much more explored in the literature. The sensitivity analysis is applied to household survey data from 17 Latin American countries, which include 92% of the population in the region. By varying these parameters within reasonable boundaries, we find that the proportion of poor could be said to be either 12. 7 percent or 65. 8 percent of the total population. Additionally, the ranking of countries with respect to poverty is also highly sensitive. This points to the need of justifying and being explicit about the underlying choices and definitions behind poverty statistics, and to the need of performing sensitivity analysis illustrating the menu of options that can answer the question of how much poverty there is.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
137.91 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.