Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/87024
Authors: 
de Heide, Marcel J.L.
Kothiyal, Amit
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 11-021/2
Abstract: 
We present a theoretical framework which allows for the comparison of the effectiveness of tax measures, loans and funding, in supporting industry-oriented research. We estimate for each of the instruments the exact contribution required by a firm to decide on investing in R&D, given the costs and probability of success of the project, and the foreseen change in profit following successful implementation of the research results. We apply Prospect Theory to analyse the risk attitude of the firm. By comparing the contribution required, we identify the instrument which is most effective, and therefore preferred by a government. Our analysis indicates that there exists a critical value for the probability of success of the project for which the modality of the most effective instruments changes. For a probability of success smaller than the critical value, a tax measures offering support only in case of successful completion of the project is preferred. For a probability higher than the critical value, a loan is most effective. The value of the critical probability depends on the perception of risk and loss aversion of the firm involved in the research.
Subjects: 
R&D
innovation
firms
public policy
JEL: 
D04
D81
O38
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
149.34 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.