Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Portrait, France
Alessie, Rob
Deeg, Dorly
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 02-120/3
Disentangling age, period, and cohort effects in explaining health trends is crucial to assess future prevalences of health disorders. The identification problem -- age, period, and cohort effects are perfectly linearly related -- is tackled by modeling cohort and period effects using lifetime macro-indicators. This approach -- innovative in analyses on health trends -- handles theidentification problem and explains mechanisms underlying cohort and period effects. The modeling approach is compared with graphical and two-factors methods. The methods are applied on Dutch trends in functional limitations using data from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. We argue that the modeling approach is a highly appropriate alternative. We find that theprevalence of functional limitations increases in the nineteen-nineties due to adverse cohort and period effects. Cohort effects are explained by hygienic and socio-economic conditions during childhood and period effects by restrictions in availability of health care services.
Age-Period-Cohort Analysis
Trends in Functional Limitations
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
498.51 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.