Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/85635
Authors: 
de Blaeij, Arianne
Florax, Raymond J.G.M.
Rietveld, Piet
Verhoef, Erik T.
Year of Publication: 
2000
Series/Report no.: 
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 00-089/3
Abstract: 
Accident costs are an important component of the external costs of traffic, a substantial part of whichis related to fatal accidents. The evaluation of fatal accident costs crucially depends on theavailability of an estimate for the economic value of a statistical life. The aim of the currentpaper is to present an overview of such estimates contained in the empirical literature on theeconomic valuation of statistical life in road safety. The technique of meta-analysis is used todetermine which variables are most appropriate to explain the variance of the value of statisticallife (VOSL) estimates that have been reported in the literature. The analysis shows, among otherthings, that the magnitude of estimates of the VOSL depends on the research method, as there is asignificant difference between stated and revealed preference studies. It also shows that VOSLestimates cannot simply be averaged over studies, as the magnitude of a VOSL estimate is directlyrelated to the initial level of risk to be caught up in a fatal traffic accident as well as the riskdecline implied by the research set-up.
Subjects: 
transport safety
value of statistical life
meta-analysis
JEL: 
D12
D81
I10
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
525.01 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.