Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/83335
Authors: 
Lundberg, Linnéa
Novák, Jiří
Vikman, Maria
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
IES Working Paper 22/2009
Abstract: 
Ethical investments have become increasingly popular over the past years. Ethical funds restrict their investment based on environmental, social and/or ethical criteria. Prior research on the performance of ethical versus non-ethical funds yields mixed results. This paper investigates the differences in risk profiles and realized returns between ethical and non-ethical funds. A sample of 23 ethical funds and 152 non-ethical funds covering the time period between 2000 and 2007 is investigated. The analysis of the portfolio composition shows that there are small differences in the structure of portfolios concerning industry composition and company size. However, the ethical funds tend to hold more stocks in their portfolios than non-ethical ones. The results provide some evidence on the underperformance of ethical funds; this underperformance is stronger in years of poor stock market performance, which indicates that systematic risk of ethical funds may be higher.
Subjects: 
ethical
social responsible investment
SRI
investment
funds
portfolio
returns
risk
screening
Sweden
JEL: 
G12
C21
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
399.94 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.