Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Aiyar, Shekhar
Dalgaard, Carl-Johan
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
EPRU Working Paper Series 2004-07
This paper tackles a number of issues that are central to cross-country comparisons of productivity. We develop a “dual” method to compare levels of total factor productivity (TFP) across nations that relies on factor price data rather than the data on stocks of factors required by standard “primal” estimates. Consistent with the development accounting literature based on primal estimates, we find that TFP accounts for the bulk of differences in income per worker across countries. However, we also find that there are significant differences between TFP series calculated using the two different approaches. We trace the reason for this divergence to inconsistencies between the data on user costs of capital and physical stocks of capital. In addition, we establish that the standard Cobb-Douglas methodology of assuming a constant capital share of one-third for all countries is a very good approximation to a more general formulation under which countries have different aggregate production functions which do not require a constant elasticity of substitution between factors.
development accounting
dual approach
Cobb-Douglas hypothesis
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Social Media Mentions:

Files in This Item:
261.58 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.