Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/80896
Authors: 
Luebker, Malte
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
WIDER Working Paper 2012/44
Abstract: 
Based on the standard axiom of individual utility maximization, rational choice has postulated that higher income inequality translates into greater redistribution by shaping the median voter's preferences. While numerous papers have tested this proposition, the literature has remained divided over the appropriate measure for redistribution. Revisiting the original contribution by Meltzer and Richard, the present paper argues that the median voter hypothesis implies that relative redistribution should increase in line with inequality. An empirical test based on 110 observations from the Luxembourg Income Study fails to find any support for the hypothesis. By contrast, voters' actual preferences offer a better guide to understanding redistributive outcomes. The findings challenge the narrow concept of human motivation that underpins rational choice, and point to the importance of fairness orientations that have been emphasized in behavioural economics.
Subjects: 
income distribution
redistribution
median voter theorem
behavioural economics
JEL: 
D31
D03
H23
H55
ISBN: 
978-92-9230-507-9
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
325.09 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.