Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/80665 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2013
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 7492
Verlag: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
We introduce three variations of the Hirshleifer-Skaperdas conflict game to study experimentally the effects of post-conflict behavior and repeated interaction on the allocation of effort between production and appropriation. Without repeated interaction, destruction of resources by defeated players can lead to lower appropriative efforts and higher overall efficiency. With repeated interaction, appropriative efforts are considerably reduced because some groups manage to avoid fighting altogether, often after substantial initial conflict. To attain peace, players must first engage in costly signaling by making themselves vulnerable and by forgoing the possibility to appropriate the resources of defeated opponents.
Schlagwörter: 
conflict
rent-seeking
appropriation
peace
escalation
tournaments
contests
JEL: 
C92
D72
D74
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
408.32 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.