Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/80308 
Year of Publication: 
2007
Series/Report no.: 
CREDIT Research Paper No. 07/10
Publisher: 
The University of Nottingham, Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade (CREDIT), Nottingham
Abstract: 
In developing societies, social norms typically ascribe differential weights to paternal, maternal and communal (or state) contributions to children’s expenses. Individuals internalize these valuations. I examine a Cournot model of voluntary contribution to children’s goods in a twoadult household, where both spouses may have marginal rates of substitution across paternal, maternal and communal contributions that differ from unity. I show that a conflict may exist between the interests of parents and those of children. Depending on the marginal rate of substitution between paternal and maternal contributions, a lump-sum redistribution from fathers to mothers may make children better off, but both parents worse off, or vice versa. Additional public contribution funded by a lump-sum tax on either parent may make children better off, but at the cost of both parents. Thus, proposals to redistribute income from fathers to mothers need to take into account socially valorized gendered asymmetries in parental roles. Furthermore, there may exist a conflict, instead of congruence, between women and their children.
Subjects: 
Intra-household distribution
social norms
domestic public good
redistribution
JEL: 
H23
H31
I38
J16
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
151.05 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.