Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/80198
Authors: 
Turner, Sergio
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper, Brown University, Department of Economics 2006-02
Abstract: 
Samuelson (1947) stated that a regular equilibrium exhibits the transfer paradox if and only if it is unstable. Gale (1974) and many in the early 1980’s debunked this equivalence by adding extra countries, reaching an anti consensus. We reinterpret Samuelson’s result as identifying the threshold, i.e. the minimum level of trade beyond which the transfer paradox appears. This reinterpretation generalizes fully to finitely many countries and commodities, and reaffirms the anti consensus quantitatively. A by-product is an explicit general example of Donsimoni and Polemarchakis (1994), that whatever the equilibrium prices and incomes, the welfare impact of a transfer is made arbitrary by some compatible economy.
Subjects: 
transfer paradox
threshold
Slutsky
instability
JEL: 
D51
D64
F11
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
279.25 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.