Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/79685
Authors: 
Bonanno, Giacomo
D‚gremont, C‚dric
Year of Publication: 
2013
Series/Report no.: 
Working Papers, University of California, Department of Economics 13-4
Abstract: 
Johan van Benthem has highlighted in his work that many questions arising in the analysis of strategic interaction call for logical and computational analysis. These questions lead to both formal and conceptually illuminating answers, in that they contribute to clarifying some of the underlying assumptions behind certain aspects of game-theoretical reasoning. We focus on the insights of a part of the literature at the interface of game theory and mathematical logic that gravitates around van Benthem's work. We discuss the formal questions raised by the perspective consisting in taking games as models for formal languages, in particular modal languages, and how eliminative reasoning processes and solution algorithms can be analyzed logically as epistemic dynamics and discuss the role played by beliefs in game-theoretical analysis and how they should be modeled from a logical point of view. We give many pointers to the literature throughout the paper.
Subjects: 
game theory
modal logic
formal languages
beliefs
epistemic dynamics
JEL: 
C7
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
381.39 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.