Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/79371 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2002
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
cemmap working paper No. CWP04/02
Verlag: 
Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice (cemmap), London
Zusammenfassung: 
We compare the finite sample performance of a range of tests of linear restrictions for linear panel data models estimated using Generalised Method of Moments (GMM). These include standard asymptotic Wald tests based on one-step and two-step GMM estimators; two bootstrapped versions of these Wald tests; a version of the two-step Wald test that uses a more accurate asymptotic approximation to the distribution of the estimator; the LM test; and three criterion-bases tests that have recently been proposed. We consider both the AR(1) panel model, and a design with predetermined regressors. The corrected two-step Wald test performs similarly to the standard one-step Wald test, whilst the bootstrapped one-step Wald test, the LM test, and a simple criterion-difference test can provide more reliable finite sample inference in some cases.
Schlagwörter: 
Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) , Hypothesis Testing , Finite Sample Inference
JEL: 
C12
C23
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
780.83 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.