Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/79150
Authors: 
Bauer, Thomas
Epstein, Gil S.
Gang, Ira N.
Year of Publication: 
2002
Series/Report no.: 
Working Papers, Department of Economics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 2002,16
Abstract: 
This paper addresses the question: Why and where do immigrants cluster? We examine the relative importance and interaction of two alternative explanations of immigrant clustering: (1) network externalities and (2) herd behavior. We advance the theory by presenting a framework encompassing both network and herd effects, and by delineating various types of network and herd effects in our empirical work. In order to distinguish between herd and network externalities, we use the Mexican Migration Project data. Our empirical results show that both network externalities and herds have significant effects on the migrant's decision of where to migrate. Moreover, the significance and size of the effects vary according to the legal status of the migrant and whether the migrant is a new or a repeat migrant. The network-externality effect has an inverse U shape, not simply a linear positive effect as often presented in the literature. Neglecting herds and/or networks, or the inverse U shape of network effects leads to faulty conclusions about migrant behavior.
Subjects: 
herd effects
immigration
location choice
network externalities
JEL: 
F22
J61
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
535.26 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.