Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/77801
Authors: 
Artabe, Alaitz
Laruelle, Annick
Valenciano, Federico
Year of Publication: 
2012
Citation: 
[Journal:] SERIEs - Journal of the Spanish Economic Association [ISSN:] 1869-4195 [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Heidelberg [Volume:] 3 [Year:] 2012 [Issue:] 1/2 [Pages:] 15-28
Abstract: 
In this paper we address several issues related to collective dichotomous decision-making by means of quaternary voting rules, i.e., when voters may choose between four actions: voting yes, voting no, abstaining and not turning up-which are aggregated by a voting rule into a dichotomous decision: acceptance or rejection of a proposal. In particular we study the links between the actions and preferences of the actors.We showthat quaternary rules (unlike binary rules,where only two actions -yes or no- are possible) leave room for manipulability” (i.e., strategic behaviour). Thus a preference profile does not in general determine an action profile. We also deal with the notions of success and decisiveness and their ex ante assessment for quaternary voting rules, and discuss the role of information and coordination in this context.
Subjects: 
voting
abstention
absent voter
JEL: 
C71
D71
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
208.15 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.