Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/73534
Authors: 
Peeters, Ronald
Vorsatz, Marc
Walzl, Markus
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
Working Papers in Economics and Statistics 2011-28
Abstract: 
We conduct a laboratory experiment to investigate the impact of institutions and institutional choice on truth-telling and trust in sender-receiver games. We find that in an institution with sanctioning opportunities, receivers sanction predominantly after having trusted lies. Individuals who sanction are responsible for truth-telling beyond standard equilibrium predictions and are more likely to choose the sanctioning institution. Sanctioning and non-sanctioning institutions coexist if their choice is endogenous and the former shows a higher level of truth-telling but lower material payoffs. It is shown that our experimental findings are consistent with the equilibrium analysis of a logit agent quantal response equilibrium with two distinct groups of individuals: one consisting of subjects who perceive non-monetary lying costs as senders and non-monetary costs when being lied to as receivers and one consisting of payoff maximizers.
Subjects: 
Experiment
Sender-receiver games
Strategic information transmission
Institutional selection
JEL: 
C91
C92
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
532.06 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.