Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/73202
Authors: 
Weichselbaumer, Doris
Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf
Year of Publication: 
2003
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University of Linz 0311
Abstract: 
Since the early seventies, hundreds of authors have calculated gender wage differentials between women and men of equal productivity. Consequently, estimates for the gender wage gap have been published for the most diverse countries at different points in time. This metastudy provides a quantitative review of this vast amount of empirical literature on gender wage discrimination as it concerns differences in methodology, data, countries and time periods. We place particular emphasis on a proper consideration of the quality of the underlying study which is done by a weighting with quality indicators. The results show that data restrictions have the biggest impact on the resulting gender wage gap. Moreover, we are able to show what effect a misspecification of the underlying wage equation-like the frequent use of potential experience-has on the calculated gender wage gap. Over time, raw wage differentials world-wide have fallen substantially; however, most of this decrease is due to an increased labor market productivity of females.
Subjects: 
Gender wage differential
meta-analysis
JEL: 
J16
J31
J71
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
299.47 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.