Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/73042
Autoren: 
Pierdzioch, Christian
Rülke, Jan-Christoph
Tillmann, Peter
Datum: 
2013
Reihe/Nr.: 
MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics 02-2013
Zusammenfassung: 
We revisit the sources of the bias in Federal Reserve forecasts and assess whether a precautionary motive can explain the forecast bias. In contrast to the existing literature, we use forecasts submitted by individual FOMC members to uncover members' implicit loss function. Our key finding is that the loss function of FOMC members is asymmetric: FOMC members incur a higher loss when they underpredict (overpredict) in ation and unemployment (real GDP) as compared to an overprediction (underprediction) of similar size. Our findings add to the recent controversy on the relative quality of FOMC forecasts compared to staff forecasts. Together with Capistrán's (2008) finding of similar asymmetries in Federal Reserve staff forecasts our results suggest that differences in predictive ability do not stem from differences in preferences. This is underlined by our second result: forecasts remain biased even after accepting an asymmetric loss function.
Schlagwörter: 
Federal Open Market Committee
forecasting
asymmetric loss function
monetary policy
JEL: 
E58
E37
E27
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
682.1 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.