Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Chiwele, Dennis Kaputo
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Country Study 20
[Background] The Ministry of Community Development and Social Services (MCDSS) has taken the decision to rollout in 2009 a national social cash transfer scheme (SCTS) to cover the whole country by 2012. Thus far, social cash transfer schemes are being piloted in five districts in Southern and Eastern Provinces. The schemes are using structures created for the implementation of the Public Welfare Assistance System (PWAS) which rise from community level all the way to the national level. The adoption of pilot SCTS in Zambia follows the growing acceptance of social cash transfers as a means for assisting extremely poor households. Partly, this is due to the positive impact of conditional cash transfers in Latin America with respect to school enrolments, improved health and reduction in poverty levels for participating households. An evaluation of the Kalomo SCTS revealed a number of achievements with respect to impact on the beneficiaries including a rise in self-esteem and confidence among beneficiaries, reduced incidence of begging, increased food consumption, increased asset ownership and positive impacts for the local economy. Field work for this assessment although not focused on assessing impacts noted qualitative evidence of these findings. Implementation of pilot schemes started in 2004 with the Kalomo SCTS followed by one in 2005 in Kazungula, 2006 in Chipata and in 2007 in Monze and Katete. The schemes have been implemented with some variation so that they 'generate information on the feasibility, costs and benefits and negative impacts of a Social Cash Transfer Scheme...(Zulu and Schuring, May 2007, p.1). Each of the pilot scheme has been designed to form a part of the learning agenda that would utilise lessons towards the design of a national social cash transfer. It is also being assessed as to the extent to which the PWAS structures are able to accommodate social cash transfer along existing social welfare activities. This assessment tackles an important question of whether the MCDSS and PWAS structures have the capacity to implement a national SCTS. It looks at three main aspects of capacity: (i) administrative capacity covering institutional, organisational and human resource capacity; (ii) physical assets and infrastructure; and, (iii) Cash transfer costs and financing. Information for the assessment was obtained through a review of various documents, focus group discussions held at all levels (national, provincial, district and sub-district level) and personal interviews of key informants. Field visits were undertaken to all the five districts with pilot and two districts in North Western Province without SCTS - Kasempa and Mufumbwe. (...)
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Social Media Mentions:


Files in This Item:
751.36 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.