Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/71092
Autoren: 
Dluhosch, Barbara
Horgos, Daniel
Zimmermann, Klaus W.
Datum: 
2012
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Diskussionspapier No. 117
Zusammenfassung: 
The nexus between income and happiness is very much disputed. Many cross-sectional studies see a positive relationship, most longitudinal studies don't. Starting from the fact that the theoretical basis in happiness research has been comparatively weak, we develop a model that identifies distributional consequences of unemployment with their importance conditional per-capita income as at the heart of the matter. Our theory is backed by empirical evidence on OECD data: in low-income countries, well-being significantly depends on income, in highincome countries on the unemployment-related Gini. Insofar, our findings establish the income-satiation hypothesis of longitudinal studies also in cross-sectional perspective.
Schlagwörter: 
Happiness
Welfare Economics
Income Distribution
Unemployment
JEL: 
D60
I31
J60
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
323.55 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.