Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/70182
Authors: 
Crosetto, Paolo
Filippin, Antonio
Year of Publication: 
2013
Series/Report no.: 
Jena Economic Research Papers 2013-009
Abstract: 
We perform a comparative analysis of five incentivized tasks used to elicit risk preferences. Theoretically, we compare the elicitation methods in terms of completeness of the range of the estimates as well as their precision, the likelihood of triggering loss aversion, and problems arising when multiple choices are required. Using original data from a homogeneous population, we experimentally investigate the distribution of estimated risk preferences, whether they differ by gender, and the complexity of the tasks. We do so using both non-parametric tests and a structural model estimated with maximum likelihood. We find that the estimated risk aversion parameters vary greatly across tasks and that gender differences appear only when the task is more likely to trigger loss aversion.
Subjects: 
elicitation methods
experiment
risk attitudes
JEL: 
C81
C91
D81
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
538.99 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.