Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Eichner, Thomas
Pethig, Rüdger
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper: Energy and Climate Economics 4125
In the basic model of the literature on international environmental agreements (IEAs) (Barrett 1994; Rubio and Ulph 2006) the number of signatories of self-enforcing IEAs does not exceed three, if non-positive emissions are ruled out. We extend that model by introducing a composite consumer good and fossil fuel that are produced and consumed in each country and traded on world markets. When signatory countries act as Stackelberg leader and emissions are positive, the size of stable IEAs may be significantly larger in our model with international trade. This would be good news if larger self-enforcing IEAs would lead to stronger reductions of total emissions. Unfortunately, in the presence of self-enforcing IEAs total emissions turn out to be only slightly less than in the business as usual scenario, independent of the number of signatories. We also investigate the role of international trade by comparing our free-trade results with the outcome in the regime of autarky. Our autarky model turns out to coincide with the basic model of the literature alluded to above. We contribute to that literature by showing that in autarky the outcome of self-enforcing IEAs is also almost the same as in business as usual.
international trade
self-enforcing environmental agreements
Stackelberg equilibrium
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
395.47 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.