Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/68827
Authors: 
Worsley, Tom
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
International Transport Forum Discussion Paper 2011-27
Abstract: 
Cost benefit analysis has been used in the United Kingdom for the appraisal of road schemes over the past fifty years. It was less widely used for rail, where most investment was concerned with renewing the existing network. The Central London Rail Study (1988) used cost benefit analysis to address the problem of overcrowding on London's rail network. The Crossrail scheme proposed in the Study was discontinued because of a recession and because of the priority given the developing links to London's Docklands. Progress on Crossrail was resumed in 2002 at the same time as the Department's appraisal methods were being revised to incorporate Wider Economic Benefits. The quantification of these additional benefits, the resolution of a source of funding and the role of the Mayor all influenced the Government's decision that the scheme should be built. Identification of some of the Wider Benefits poses problems for transport models that are only partially resolved through the use of land use transport interaction models. Although the use of a Gross Value Added metric provides an alternative way of estimating the economic impacts of a scheme, it does not replace cost benefit analysis as a decision aid for government ministers.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
888.24 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.