Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/68597 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
Dez-2011
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Labour Economics [ISSN:] 0927-5371 [Volume:] 18 [Issue:] 6 [Publisher:] Elsevier [Place:] Amsterdam [Year:] 2011 [Pages:] 786-797
Verlag: 
Elsevier, Amsterdam
Zusammenfassung: 
This study analyzes real wage cyclicality for male full-time workers within employer–employee matches in Germany over the period 1984–2004. Five different wage measures are compared: the standard hourly wage rate; hourly wage earnings including overtime and bonus pay; the effective wage, which takes into account unpaid overtime; and monthly earnings, with and without additional pay. None of the hourly wage measures exhibits cyclicality except for the group of salaried workers with unpaid overtime. Their effective wages show a strongly procyclical reaction to changes in unemployment. Despite acyclical wage rates, salaried workers without unpaid overtime experienced procyclical earnings movements if they had income from extra pay. Monthly earnings were also procyclical for hourly paid workers with overtime pay. These findings suggest that cyclical earnings movements are generated by variable pay components, such as bonuses and overtime pay, and by flexible working hours. The degree of earnings procyclicality revealed for the German labor market is comparable to the United States.
Schlagwörter: 
Real wage cyclicality
Effective wages
Unpaid overtime
Bonus payments
Firm stayers
JEL: 
E32
J31
DOI der veröffentlichten Version: 
Sonstige Angaben: 
NOTICE: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Labour Economics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Labour Economics 18 (2011), 6, pp. 786-797 and is online available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2011.06.002
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Manuscript Version (Preprint)

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.