Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/68450
Authors: 
Shrimali, Gireesh
Jenner, Steffen
Groba, Felix
Chan, Gabriel
Indvik, Joe
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
DIW Discussion Papers 1258
Abstract: 
Renewable portfolio standards (RPS) are the most popular U.S. state-level policies for promoting deployment of renewable electricity (RES-E). While several econometric studies have estimated the effect of RPS on in-state RES-E deployment, results are contradictory. We reconcile these studies and move toward a definitive answer to the question of RPS effectiveness. We conduct an analysis using time series cross sectional regressions - including the most nuanced controls for policy design features to date - and nonparametric matching analysis. We find that higher RPS stringency does not necessarily drive more RES-E deployment. We examine several RPS design features and market characteristics (including REC unbundling, RPS in neighboring states, out-of-state renewable energy purchases) that may explain the gap between effective and ineffective policies. We also investigate other RES-E policies and technology-specific effects. Ultimately, we show that RPS effectiveness is largely explained by a combination of policy design, market context, and inter-state trading effects.
Subjects: 
Renewable energy
Renewable portfolio standards
Panel data models
Matching analysis
JEL: 
C23
H23
Q42
Q48
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.