Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/67861
Authors: 
Usher, Dan
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
Queen's Economics Department Working Paper 1266
Abstract: 
A duty to vote may be many things. It may be no more than an obligation to cast one's ballot as self-interestedly or as altruistically as one pleases. It may a requirement to vote for the political party most likely to yield the highest social welfare. It may be a requirement to choose between competing parties in the interest of one's social class or with recognition of the needs of the poor. It may include a requirement to inform oneself about the issues in an election. This paper begins with a critique of the argument denying any duty to vote because, as with participants in the market, there is no conflict between selfinterest and public interest in the choice whether to vote or abstain. The core of the paper is a discussion of several interpretations of the duty to vote, and there is a brief review of pros and cons of compulsory voting.
Subjects: 
pivotal voting
duty to vote
compulsory voting
JEL: 
D72
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
343.88 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.