Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/67244 
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 6881
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
This paper examines both the determinants and the effects of changes in the rigidity of labor market legislation across countries over time. Recent research identifies the origin of the legal system as being a major determinant of the cross-country variation in the rigidity of employment protection legislation. However, the supporting evidence is largely confined to levels of regulation and is almost exclusively based on international cross-section data for the post-1995 period. This paper introduces a new index capturing the rigidity of employment protection legislation (LAMRIG) for an unbalanced panel of more than 140 countries over time starting in 1960. Although the importance of legal origins in explaining the level of rigidity of labor regulations across countries is replicated using LAMRIG, their explanatory power is much weakened for changes over time (1960-2004.) More important as determinants of such changes are the level of development and other reforms such as trade liberalization. With respect to the effects of changes in the rigidity of labor regulations on growth and inequality, which have been very controversial in the literature, results with LAMRIG support Freeman's conjecture that changes in rigidity do not systematically affect economic growth but do lower income inequality.
Subjects: 
employment protection legislation
labor market institutions
reforms
JEL: 
J41
J65
J33
K31
O21
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
517.82 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.