Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/67243
Autoren: 
Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina
Sparber, Chad
Datum: 
2012
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 6857
Zusammenfassung: 
The 1996 Immigration Reform and Responsibility Act barred states from giving unlawful residents postsecondary education benefits that states do not offer to U.S. citizens. In contrast to this federal law, several states have passed legislation explicitly allowing undocumented immigrants to pay in-state tuition rates. We use a difference-in-difference estimation methodology to assess intended and unintended consequences of this tuition policy. First, we find evidence consistent with past studies that postsecondary enrollment rates of Hispanic non-citizens have increased in treatment states relative to control states without negatively impacting the enrollment rates of native-born Americans. Second, state policies benefiting undocumented immigrants have not increased tuition and fees at comprehensive and community colleges attended by the vast majority of students, though rates have risen at flagship universities. Finally, despite some weak association with increased indebtedness among Hispanic natives, resident tuition subsidies for undocumented immigrants do not appear to have reduced financial aid or increased indebtedness for other demographic groups.
Schlagwörter: 
immigration
college tuition
DREAM Act
JEL: 
F22
J15
I23
I28
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
204.51 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.