Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/67243
Authors: 
Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina
Sparber, Chad
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper Series, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 6857
Abstract: 
The 1996 Immigration Reform and Responsibility Act barred states from giving unlawful residents postsecondary education benefits that states do not offer to U.S. citizens. In contrast to this federal law, several states have passed legislation explicitly allowing undocumented immigrants to pay in-state tuition rates. We use a difference-in-difference estimation methodology to assess intended and unintended consequences of this tuition policy. First, we find evidence consistent with past studies that postsecondary enrollment rates of Hispanic non-citizens have increased in treatment states relative to control states without negatively impacting the enrollment rates of native-born Americans. Second, state policies benefiting undocumented immigrants have not increased tuition and fees at comprehensive and community colleges attended by the vast majority of students, though rates have risen at flagship universities. Finally, despite some weak association with increased indebtedness among Hispanic natives, resident tuition subsidies for undocumented immigrants do not appear to have reduced financial aid or increased indebtedness for other demographic groups.
Subjects: 
immigration
college tuition
DREAM Act
JEL: 
F22
J15
I23
I28
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
204.51 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.