Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/66835
Authors: 
Hensher, David A.
Rose, John M.
de Dios Ortúzar, Juan
Rizzi, Luis I.
Year of Publication: 
2011
Citation: 
[Journal:] Journal of Choice Modelling [ISSN:] 1755-5345 [Volume:] 4 [Year:] 2011 [Issue:] 2 [Pages:] 70-94
Abstract: 
In recent years there has been a re-focus on the valuation of a statistical life from the ex post or human capital method to an ex ante willingness to pay (WTP) approach. This is in part a recognition that we need to focus on establishing the amount, ex ante, that individuals are willing to pay to reduce the risk of exposure to circumstances that might lead to death or degree of injury in the road environment. This study sets out a framework in which to identify the degree of preference heterogeneity in WTP of pedestrians to avoid being killed or injured. A stated choice experiment approach is developed. The empirical setting is a choice of walking route for a particular trip that a sample of pedestrians periodically undertakes in Australia. Mixed logit models are estimated to obtain the marginal (dis)utilities associated with each influence on the choice amongst the attribute packages offered in the stated choice scenarios. These conditional estimates are used to obtain the WTP distributions for fatality and classes of injury avoidance, which are then aggregated to obtain estimates for pedestrians of the value of risk reduction (VRR).
Subjects: 
value of statistical life
value of risk reduction
fatalities
serious injury
pedestrians
choice experiment
willingness to pay
survey
Australia
Creative Commons License: 
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/
Document Type: 
Article
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
371.98 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.