Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/66752 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2011
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] e-Finanse: Financial Internet Quarterly [ISSN:] 1734-039X [Volume:] 7 [Issue:] 3 [Publisher:] University of Information Technology and Management [Place:] Rzeszów [Year:] 2011 [Pages:] 75-84
Verlag: 
University of Information Technology and Management, Rzeszów
Zusammenfassung: 
Company valuation is not done after having generated a few values being a result of applying different valuation methods. In many cases institutions ordering the valuation request a value which can be an equivalent of a market, transactional value. Often the one method (and the valuation resulting from the method) can be indicated, since the valuer claims that it gives the most precise value of the company. However, it is safer to consider the range of values and then try to determine the final value which is the result of a combination of several methods. However, the question is how to consistently deal with a range of values. One of the solutions are so-called mixed methods of company valuation. They are criticized in this paper as they are too subjective. Instead we suggest considering a portfolio approach PATEV (Portfolio Approach to Equity Valuation). In addition to having to choose a method of defining one value, the value is subject to further corrections: liquidity and control discounts.
Schlagwörter: 
company valuation
range of values
liquidity discounts
JEL: 
G32
C53
G12
Dokumentart: 
Article
Erscheint in der Sammlung:

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
391.43 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.