Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/66571
Authors: 
van den Berg, Gerard J.
Weynandt, Michèle A.
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 497
Abstract: 
This paper explores the difference between intentions and realizations in return migration with the help of a duration model. Using the GSOEP the results lend support to the fact that people use simplifying heuristics when trying to forecast the future; their return intentions indicate bunching in heaps of 5 years. Along these lines we find that migrated individuals systematically underestimate the length of their stay in the receiving country. We find that the difference decreases the older one gets, but is larger the more disadvantaged one feels due to ones origin as an example. The robustness checks show that the results do not hinge on a single definition, or set of explaining variables. The consistency in the underestimation may have important policy and modeling implications.
Subjects: 
duration analysis
international migration
hedonic forecasting
utility misprediction
JEL: 
C41
D84
F22
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
374.03 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.