Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/66558
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Busse, Matthias | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-11-20T15:58:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-11-20T15:58:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | |aIntereconomics|c1613-964X|v45|h4|nSpringer|lHeidelberg|y2010|p249-254 | en |
dc.identifier.pi | doi:10.1007/s10272-010-0343-6 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/66558 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Negotiations on the Economic Partnership Agreements between African, Caribbean and Pacific countries and the European Union have not been making much progress recently. How should the Partnership Agreements be structured to ensure a pro-development outcome and how could the negotiations gain more momentum in the months and years ahead? | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aSpringer |cHeidelberg | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.title | Revisiting the ACP-EU economic partnership agreements: The role of complementary trade and investment policies | - |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 730076563 | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
econstor.documentversion | Published Version | en |
econstor.citation.journaltitle | Intereconomics | en |
econstor.citation.issn | 1613-964X | en |
econstor.citation.volume | 45 | en |
econstor.citation.issue | 4 | en |
econstor.citation.publisher | Springer | en |
econstor.citation.publisherplace | Heidelberg | en |
econstor.citation.year | 2010 | en |
econstor.citation.startpage | 249 | en |
econstor.citation.endpage | 254 | en |
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.