Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/66154
Authors: 
Kimakova, Alena
Year of Publication: 
2009
Citation: 
[Journal:] Intereconomics [ISSN:] 1613-964X [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Heidelberg [Volume:] 44 [Year:] 2009 [Issue:] 3 [Pages:] 142-148
Abstract: 
This paper highlights that the EMU transition process itself can pose challenges to individual accession countries and draws policy implications for ERM II. Differences in financial market development and international liabilities underscore the risks and benefits of ERM II, and may lead to conflict between short and long-term policy objectives.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.