Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Jenkins, Stephen P.
Van Kerm, Philippe
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
ISER Working Paper Series 2011-06
Assessments of whose income growth is the greatest and whose is the smallest are typically based on comparisons of income changes for income groups (e.g. rich versus poor) or income values (e.g. quantiles). However, income group and quantile composition changes over time because of income mobility. To summarize patterns of income growth while also tracking the fortunes of the same individuals, a longitudinal perspective is required. For this case, we develop dominance conditions and summary indices for comparisons of distributions of individual income growth, together with associated methods of estimation and inference. Using these methods and data from the British Household Panel Survey, we study individual income growth for periods between 1991 and 2005. We show that income growth was significantly more pro-poor in the early years of the Labour government than in earlier Conservative years.
individual income growth
pro-poor growth
progressive income growth
income mobility
mobility profile
British Household Panel Survey
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
817.32 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.