Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/65842 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDaley, Jeniferen
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, Kenten
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-24-
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-02T14:30:03Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-02T14:30:03Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/65842-
dc.description.abstractThe recent literature on measuring bank performance indicates a preference for sophisticated techniques over simple accounting ratios. We explore the results and relationships between bank efficiency estimates using accounting ratios and Data Envelope Analysis (DEA) with bootstrap among Jamaican banks between 1998 and 2007. The results indicate different outcomes for the traditional accounting ratios and the sophisticated DEA methodology in the measurement of bank efficiency. GLS random effects two-variable regression tests for superiority using a risk index for insolvency suggest an advantage in favour of the DEA.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aCardiff University, Cardiff Business School |cCardiffen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aCardiff Economics Working Papers |xE2009/24en
dc.subject.jelG21en
dc.subject.jelG28en
dc.subject.jelG29en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordBank efficiencyen
dc.subject.keywordJamaicaen
dc.subject.keywordAccounting Ratiosen
dc.subject.stwBanken
dc.subject.stwBankgeschäften
dc.subject.stwUnternehmenserfolgen
dc.subject.stwMessungen
dc.subject.stwJamaikaen
dc.titleMeasuring bank efficiency: Tradition or sophistication? - A note-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn613127552en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size
335.48 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.