Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/65802
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dixon, Huw | en |
dc.contributor.author | Zhou, Peng | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-12-16 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-11-02T14:28:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-11-02T14:28:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/65802 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper uses unpublished retailer-level microdata underlying UK consumer price indices to investigate price rigidity. Based on the conventional method, little rigidity is found in frequency of price change, since the implied price duration is only 5.5 months. However, it significantly underestimates the true duration (9.3 months) as suggested by cross-sectional method. Results also exhibit conspicuous heterogeneities in rigidity across sectors and shop types but weak difference across regions and time. The overall distribution of duration can be decomposed by sector into a decreasing component and a cyclical component with 4-month cycles. Both time and state dependent features exist in pricing. These findings support New Keynesian theories and enable a better calibration to improve the performances of macroeconomic models. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aCardiff University, Cardiff Business School |cCardiff | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | |aCardiff Economics Working Papers |xE2010/11 | en |
dc.subject.jel | C41 | en |
dc.subject.jel | D22 | en |
dc.subject.jel | E31 | en |
dc.subject.jel | L11 | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Price Rigidity | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Price Duration | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Microdata | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Cross-Sectional | en |
dc.title | An empirical study on price rigidity | - |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 641932774 | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.