Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSalanauskaitÄ—, Linaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVerbist, Gerlindeen_US
dc.description.abstractTo what extent can a country's effectiveness in reducing child poverty be attributed to the size of family cash transfers (i.e. both benefits and tax advantages) or to their design? In this paper, we disentangle the importance of each of these two factors, focusing on the family support system in Lithuania and comparing it with four other new member states. Both single and large families have increased susceptibility to poverty in Lithuania. This contrasts with other former communist countries, namely Estonia, Hungary, Slovenia and the Czech Republic which protect these family types much better. This paper examines whether their family transfer systems would achieve similar results in Lithuania. We employ the EUROMOD microsimulation tax-benefit model to swap family policies across countries and to test whether size or design has greater effects on child poverty reduction in Lithuania. Our results point to considerably improving poverty situation among large families under Hungarian, Slovenian and the Czech policies. Single parent families would only gain if Lithuanian spending on family transfers would increase by a large degree. Estonian policies would lead to very mixed results: small gains for large families and losses for single parent families.en_US
dc.publisher|aUniv. of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research |cColchesteren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aEUROMOD Working Paper |xEM4/11en_US
dc.subject.keywordchild povertyen_US
dc.subject.keywordfamily benefits and tax advantagesen_US
dc.subject.keywordnew EU member statesen_US
dc.titleIs the "neighbour's" lawn greener? Comparing family support in Lithuania and four other NMSen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US

Files in This Item:
570.22 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.