Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/64444 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVernengo, Matiasen
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-19-
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-28T12:39:03Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-28T12:39:03Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/64444-
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides a rejoinder to Colander, Holt and Rosser (2010) strategy to win friends and influence mainstream economics. It is suggested that their strategy is counter-productive, and while it might gain them friends, it will not lead to increased influence of heterodox ideas within what they term the cutting edge of the profession. It is argued that their failure to understand the nature of heterodoxy, and the reason for the eclecticism of the mainstream, associated to the rise of vulgar economics, undermines their arguments.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aThe University of Utah, Department of Economics |cSalt Lake City, UTen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking Paper |x2011-14en
dc.subject.jelB41en
dc.subject.jelB59en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordMethodologyen
dc.subject.keywordHeterodox Economicsen
dc.titleThe return of vulgar economics: A rejoinder to Colander, Holt and Rosser-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn666400261en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.