Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/64444 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2011
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Working Paper No. 2011-14
Verlag: 
The University of Utah, Department of Economics, Salt Lake City, UT
Zusammenfassung: 
This paper provides a rejoinder to Colander, Holt and Rosser (2010) strategy to win friends and influence mainstream economics. It is suggested that their strategy is counter-productive, and while it might gain them friends, it will not lead to increased influence of heterodox ideas within what they term the cutting edge of the profession. It is argued that their failure to understand the nature of heterodoxy, and the reason for the eclecticism of the mainstream, associated to the rise of vulgar economics, undermines their arguments.
Schlagwörter: 
Methodology
Heterodox Economics
JEL: 
B41
B59
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
99.79 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.