Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/63567 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorBurnell, Peteren
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-21T09:46:24Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-21T09:46:24Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.isbn9291906336en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/63567-
dc.description.abstractThis study is premised on the view that reports circulating in the 1990s, claiming foreign aid was in terminal crisis, were premature. Aid’s reviving fortunes are explained in terms both of a growing awareness of the uneven implications of globalization and the after-effects of the terrorist events of 11 September 2001. However these two ‘drivers’ make uneasy partners. Furthermore, aid for democratization, argued in the 1990s to be an instrument for indirectly addressing socioeconomic weakness and improving development aid’s effectiveness—making it a positive feature in a bleak decade—is increasingly seen as problematic. For now, aid’s resurgence should target pro-poor development rather than democratic reform, although the likelihood is that old fashioned determinants of realpolitik will continue to get in the way.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aThe United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER) |cHelsinkien
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWIDER Research Paper |x2004/44en
dc.subject.jelF35en
dc.subject.jelO19en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordforeign aiden
dc.subject.keywordinternational linkages to developmenten
dc.subject.keywordrole of international organizationsen
dc.subject.stwEntwicklungshilfeen
dc.subject.stwEntwicklungsorganisationen
dc.titleForeign aid resurgent: New spirit or old hangover?-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn396668097en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
198.95 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.