Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/63151
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMehlum, Halvoren_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-20T13:15:59Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-20T13:15:59Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/63151-
dc.description.abstractIn this note I bring a new aspect into the so called Island Problem. Given that only cases where there is a suspect reaches the court, what is the consequence for the probability of guilt? I find that it indeed matters for the results that court cases are selected in this way. The analysis illustrates the general point that the exact protocol by which data are generated is an essential part of the information that should be used when analyzing data.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aDep. of Economics, Univ. of Oslo |cOsloen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aMemorandum, Department of Economics, University of Oslo |x2003,30en_US
dc.subject.jelC11en_US
dc.subject.jelen_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordBayesian analysisen_US
dc.subject.keywordForensic statisticsen_US
dc.subject.stwStichprobenverfahrenen_US
dc.subject.stwSchätztheorieen_US
dc.titleA finer point in forensic identificationen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn373611676en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.