Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/62648
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | de Clippel, Geoffroy | en |
dc.contributor.author | Eliaz, Kfir | en |
dc.contributor.author | Knight, Brian | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-06 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-17T11:31:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-17T11:31:46Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/62648 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A key feature of arbitration is the possibility for conflicting parties to partake in the selection of the person who will rule the case. We analyze this problem of the selection of arbitrators from the perspective of implementation theory. Theoretical, empirical and experimental arguments are combined to highlight difficulties with a procedure that is commonly used in practice and to develop and identify better performing procedures. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aBrown University, Department of Economics |cProvidence, RI | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | |aWorking Paper |x2012-8 | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.title | On the selection of arbitrators | - |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 723933774 | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.