Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/62587 
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 6613
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Past estimates of the effect of family income on child development have often been plagued by endogeneity and measurement error. In this paper, we use an instrumental variables strategy to estimate the causal effect of income on children's math and reading achievement. Our identification derives from the large, non-linear changes in the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) over the last two decades. The largest of these changes increased family income by as much as 20%, or approximately $2,100, between 1993 and 1997. Using a panel of roughly 4,500 children matched to their mothers from National Longitudinal Survey of Youth datasets allows us to address problems associated with unobserved heterogeneity, endogenous transitory income shocks, and measurement error in income. Our baseline estimates imply that a $1,000 increase in income raises combined math and reading test scores by 6% of a standard deviation in the short-run. Test gains are larger for children from disadvantaged families and are robust to a variety of alternative specifications.
Subjects: 
family income
poverty
educational achievement
JEL: 
I2
I3
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
356.78 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.